I think anarchy can be largely lived as an individual, without requiring it from the society around you: I can live according to my own morals, non-aggressively, and - for example - withhold information on my whereabouts, my assets, etc. as I please while making sure to avoid legal consequences.
What is much more serious nevertheless is the point you have been stressing, Darius: Smiling politicians are hungrily shoving us towards a big war using nice-sounding platitudes, and that is scary as hell. Anything we can do to expand our influence and help avoid that we should do.
I think anarchy can be largely lived as an individual, without requiring it from the society around you: I can live according to my own morals, non-aggressively, and - for example - withhold information on my whereabouts, my assets, etc. as I please while making sure to avoid legal consequences.
What is much more serious nevertheless is the point you have been stressing, Darius: Smiling politicians are hungrily shoving us towards a big war using nice-sounding platitudes, and that is scary as hell. Anything we can do to expand our influence and help avoid that we should do.
So true… I can’t even agree with myself on those points, let alone with someone else. Definitely in the no border camp personally 😁
I am 50/50 on anarchism. No, wait, maybe 80/20.
You see, the ideas of Anarchism are complex. Anarchistd can't even agree on them between themselves.
One thing they (and I) agree is the non agression principle. The rest is a deep mess.
Private property or no privite property.
Laws or no Laws.
Communes or individualism.
Boarders or no boarders.
And on it goes.